The Cloud or Objects Existed in Their Nothingness or Absolute Fiction in the theory of Ibn ʿArabī and its relevance to the Western and Eastern Theories
Abstract
First, we say that the cloud is generated from the vapors have the elements of heat. Then the air that surrounds the body of cloud is denied. It is the divine breath, caused by a longing movement based on the love to be discovered and emerged. It's the soles of the divinity - as Ibn ʿArabī says-because it is the closest creature to God as being an object… By this way the cloud is the same divine-self, in which everything has created.
Second, we see that the relationship between the divine science and information to Ibn ʿArabī is a love affair confirms the uniformity between the objects fixed and cloud caused by the divine self to vent the longing to emerge. The fixed objects are found in this cloud as being the realities of the world and its foundation. If the cloud - as we shall see soon - is the absolute fiction, it is natural that Ibn ʿArabī unites - also - between the objects fixed and absolute imagination as being the assets in the ranking of the fantasy existence as being the existential mediator between the divine and the world or between Being and Nothingness. (1)
Downloads
References
2. Ibid, part 2, p 329
3. Ibid, part 2, p 310, and see also Maḥmūd Qasim: Imagination in the doctrine of Ibn ʿArabī, p 7
4. Ibid, part 2, p 310, see also ibid, part 3, p 420
5. Ibid, part 1, p 119
6. Ibid, part 2, p 283
7. Ibid, part 2, p 150
8. Ibid, part 2, p 55
9. Abu al-ʿElā ʿAfifī, Mystical philosophy of Ibn ʿArabī, within the memorial book: Mysticism - Spiritual Revolution in Islam - House of the knowledge, First Edition, 1963 AD, p 50
10. Muḥyiddin Ibn ʿArabī, Conquests of Mecca, part 2, p 281
11. Ibid, part 4, p 108, see also ibid, part 2, p 63
12. Abu al-ʿElā ʿAfifī, Fixed objects in the doctrine of Ibn ʿArabī and “Non-Beings” in the doctrine of Mu'tazila, within the memorial book: Mysticism - Spiritual Revolution in Islam - House of the knowledge, the first edition, 1963, p 217
13. Muḥyiddin Ibn ʿArabī, Conquests of Mecca, part 4, p 211
14. Ibid, part 3, pp. 46-47
15. ʿUmar Al-ʿAṭṭār, The clear conquest, al-Matbaʿa al-Khayriyya, Egypt, 1304 H. p 14-16
16. An article in the "Hindu mythology", Journal of the culture of India, September 1956, p: 39, 40.41
17. Abu al-ʿElā ʿAfifī, The objects fixed in the doctrine of Ibn ʿArabī, and “Non-Beings” in the doctrine of Mu'tazila, p 214
18. Nellino, Greek Heritage and Islamic Civilization, second edition, Egypt, 1946, p: 245
19. Waḥiduddin al-Kirmānī: Islamic Sects, Baghdad, 1972, p: 16 245
20. Hannā Fakhury and Al-jar: The history of Arabic philosophy, the first edition, Beirut, 1975, part 1, p: 156
21. Abdul Sattār Izz al-Din al-Rāwi, Philosophy of Mind, (no date), Department of Cultural Affairs and publishing, 1984, Freedom House, Baghdad, p: 63
22. Muḥyiddin Ibn ʿArabī, Conquests of Mecca, part 4, p 211
23. Abu al-ʿElā ʿAfifī, The objects fixed in the doctrine of Ibn ʿArabī and “Non-Beings” in the doctrine of Mu'tazila, p 213
Copyright (c) 2018 IJRDO - Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research (ISSN: 2456-2971)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the IJRDO Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.