THEORETICAL STUDY RELATED TO THE FACTORS OF RELIGION CONFLICT IN THE COMMUNITY
Abstract
The emergence of one group's stereotype against other groups of different religions usually triggers the conflict between religious community followed by effort to attack each other, to kill each other, to burn houses of worship and places of value of each religion. Referring to the explanation above, this article analyzes the background factors that make the occurrence of religious conflict in the community. The results of the study of the literature review can be concluded that religious conflict was a form of dispute or conflict between individuals or groups in society. This contradiction can involve two people or many people in social movement, group interest, class, gender, organization, political party, ethnicity, race or religion, and other interest. Factors causing religious conflict were the existence of truth claims by individuals or certain groups that increasingly makes blurred (biased) between religious area and tribal area, wrong understanding related to jihad due to radicalism doctrine and understanding, lack of religious tolerance and lack of pluralism ideology understanding. Then the issues that have the potential to cause conflict are related to moral issues, sectarian issues, communal issues, terrorism issues, religious-political issues, and other issues.
Downloads
References
Aisyah St. BM. Konflik Sosial Dalam Hubungan Antar Umat Beragama. Jurnal Dakwah Tabligh, Vol. 15, No. 2, Desember 2014 : 189 - 208
Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (2005). Fundamentalism and authoritarianism. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 378-393). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Blogowska, J., & Saroglou, V. (2011). Religious fundamentalism and limited prosociality as a function of the target. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50, 44-60.
Brandt, M. J., & Renya, C. (2010). The role of prejudice and the need for closure in religious fundamental- ism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 715-725.
Brandt, M. J., & Van Tongeren, D. R. (2015). People both high and low on religious fundamentalism are prejudiced towards dissimilar groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/pspp0000076
Cohen, A. B., Gorvine, B. J., & Gorvine, H. (2013). The religion, spirituality, and psychology of Jews. In K. I. Pargament, J. J. Exlne, & J. W. Jones (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spiritu- ality. Vol. 1: Context, theory, and research (pp. 665-679). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Duriez, B., Dezutter, J., Neyrinck, B., & Hutsebaut, D. (2007). An introduction to the Post-Critical Belief Scale: Internal structure and external relationships. Psyke & Logos, 28, 767-793.
Durkheim, E. (2010). Suicid: A study in sosiolo- gy. New York: Free Press.
Hall, D., Matz, D. C., & Wood, W. (2010). Why don’t we practice what we preach? A meta-analytic review of religious racism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 126-139.
Jamil, Achmad & Irawan, Enjang Pera. The Analysis of Lebak Smart City Application Based on Mobile in Improving Lebak Regency Government Service. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR) (2018) Volume 39, No 2, pp 149-164
Jary, David & Julia Jary. 1991. Collins Dictionary of Sociology, Harper Collins Publisher
Levin, J. (2001). God, faith, and health explor- ing the spirituality-healing connection. New York: John Wiley & Son, Inc.
Mahadi Ujang. Membangun Kerukunan Masyarakat Beda Agama Melalui Interaksi Dan Komunikasi Harmoni Di Desa Talang Benuang Provinsi Bengkulu. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, Volume 1, No. 1, Juni 2013
Masykur. (2006). Pola komunikasi antar umat beragama: studi atas dialog umat islam dan kristen di kota cilegon banten. Diakses dari www.ditpertais.net/annualconference/an- con06/makalah/
Rowatt, W. C., Shen, M. J., LaBouff, J. P., & Gonzalez, A. (2013). Religious fundamentalism, right-wing authoritarianism, and prejudice: Insights from meta-analyses, implicit social cognition, and social neu- roscience. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed., pp. 457-475). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Sairin, W. (2006). Kerukunan umat beragama pilar utama kerukunan bangsa: butir-butir pikiran. Jakarta: Gunung Mulia.
Saroglou Vassilis, Intergroup Conflict, Religious Fundamentalism, and Culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2016, Vol. 47(1) 33–41
Saroglou, V., Corneille, O., & Van Cappellen, P. (2009). “Speak, Lord, your servant is listening”: Religious priming activates submissive thoughts and behaviors. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19, 143-154.
Susan, Pengantar Sosiologi Konflik dan Isu-Isu Konflik Kontemporer, Cet. 2; Jakarta: Kencana, 2010
Thaha (Editor), Konteks Berteologi di Indonesia Pengalaman Islam, Cet. I,Jakarta: Paramadina, 1999
Turner, Jonathan H. 1986. The Structure of Sociological Theory, Chicago: The Dorsey Press.
Van Pachterbeke, M., Freyer, C., & Saroglou, V. (2011). When authoritarianism meets religion: Sacrificing others in the name of abstract deontology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 898-903.
Yunus Firdaus M. Konflik Agama Di Indonesia Problem Dan Solusi Pemecahannya. Substantia, Volume 16 Nomor 2, Okotber 2014
Copyright (c) 2020 IJRDO - Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research (ISSN: 2456-2971)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the IJRDO Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.
